McDonnell Douglas MD-82

15,363 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
141T0051178OEM
141T121979OEM
141T1220-122PMA
141T1220-132PMA
141T13314OEM
141T13425OEM
141T21602OEM
141T300111OEM
141T300114OEM
141T3001141OEM
141T3001143OEM
141T32134OEM
141T32201OEM
141T32301
141T3230106OEM
141T32302OEM
141T32313OEM
141T33112OEM
141T33301OEM
141T333086OEM
141T483548OEM
141T483551OEM
141T483569OEM
141T483598OEM
141T4918-3 CZOEM
141T5107104OEM
141T510747OEM
141T51081OEM
141T511360OEM
141T5114129OEM
141T512174OEM
141T5130OEM
141T5146OEM
141T51479OEM
141T517164OEM
141T517220OEM
141T52098OEM
141T52825OEM
141T5714136OEM
141T585640OEM
141T585647OEM
141T585649OEM
141T5876105OEM
141T612162OEM
141T63443OEM
141T66621OEM
141T693241OEM
141T831312OEM
141T8320OEM
141T861115OEM

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

MD-80 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
752025
2015: 809 cycles/aircraft2016: 734 cycles/aircraft2017: 739 cycles/aircraft2018: 778 cycles/aircraft2019: 613 cycles/aircraft2020: 124 cycles/aircraft2021: 35 cycles/aircraft2022: 53 cycles/aircraft2023: 58 cycles/aircraft2024: 86 cycles/aircraft2025: 75 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020: 124
Recovered to 14% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
1%44%20152025
2015: 1.2% freighter share2016: 1.2% freighter share2017: 1.5% freighter share2018: 1.7% freighter share2019: 2.3% freighter share2020: 14.2% freighter share2021: 60.2% freighter share2022: 62.4% freighter share2023: 54.3% freighter share2024: 37.6% freighter share2025: 43.5% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
1202025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

MD-80 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
49aircraft
Stayed domestic
42vs 7 exported
Avg age at retirement
38.3years
Still US-registered
119aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
P & W JT8D series8417229834.4 yr
P & W JT8D-21922444034.5 yr
P & W JT8D-9 series9244253.8 yr
P & W JT9D series13373041.7 yr
P & W JT8D-18213033 yr
P & W JT8D-17 series7161144 yr
P & W JT8D-156131151 yr
P & W JT8D-9A51100

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2026)

MD-80 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$471fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$432/$39
Reporting carriers
3

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

2airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2025-09-11effective Jun 12, 2025Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD- 83), DC 9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes, and Model DC-9-10, DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by the discovery of jammed elevators during takeoff. This AD requires revising the "Certificate Limitations" section of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to include a procedure to confirm elevator surfaces are not jammed in the trailing edge down (TED) position. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2023-01-13effective Mar 13, 2023Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC- 9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 (MD-87) airplanes; and Model MD-88 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that certain center wing lower stringers are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). WFD analysis found that fatigue cracks could grow to a critical length after the structural modification point (SMP) for these center wing lower stringers. This AD requires replacing certain left and right side center wing lower stringers. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.