Boeing 727-100

13,571 parts applicable to this airframe — narrowbody

Part NumberStatus
140N2001117OEM
140N200122OEM
140N2002101OEM
140N2002248OEM
141W5131OEM
143A11102OEM
143N10461OEM
143N10822OEM
143N311088OEM
143N53402OEM
143N534436OEM
143N53447OEM
143N53459OEM
143N535288OEM
143N535458OEM
143N535468OEM
143N545753OEM
143N55071OEM
143N6603223OEM
143N821516OEM
143N831212OEM
143N832229OEM
143N832860OEM
143N8328V53OEM
144N814044OEM
146A750231OEM
146N10136OEM
146N10353OEM
146N539328OEM
146N539337OEM
146N542525OEM
146N54256OEM
146N542622OEM
146N54269OEM
146N544052OEM
146N54407OEM
146N544341OEM
146N544711OEM
146N544713OEM
146N544826OEM
146N61004OEM
146N6603172OEM
146N6609Y9OEM
146N852215OEM
146N8769OEM
146T586956OEM
148N85018002OEM
149N6016126OEM
149N6016128OEM
149N712865OEM

Utilization & cargo trend(US carriers, 2015–2025)

727 family rollup — BTS T-100, domestic + international

Cycles per aircraft
242025
2015: 25 cycles/aircraft2016: 24 cycles/aircraft2017: 38 cycles/aircraft2018: 68 cycles/aircraft2019: 62 cycles/aircraft2020: 89 cycles/aircraft2021: 93 cycles/aircraft2022: 83 cycles/aircraft2023: 68 cycles/aircraft2024: 27 cycles/aircraft2025: 24 cycles/aircraft
20152025
2020: 89
Recovered to 44% of 2019 (2024 vs 2019)
Freighter share of departures
86%57%20152025
2015: 85.6% freighter share2016: 82.7% freighter share2017: 80.7% freighter share2018: 76.7% freighter share2019: 75.6% freighter share2020: 91.3% freighter share2021: 88.3% freighter share2022: 67.7% freighter share2023: 59.1% freighter share2024: 49.5% freighter share2025: 56.5% freighter share
20152025
Est. US-registered fleet
352025
20152025

US carriers only (BTS T-100, domestic + international segments) — foreign-carrier flying is excluded, so global utilization runs higher. Fleet size is reconstructed from the FAA registry (built on or before each year, not yet deregistered) — an approximation. Freighter share counts departures with zero passengers and freight aboard — a proxy for freighter/combi operations, not a tail-by-tail conversion count. Missing years render as gaps.

USM supply — retirements & teardowns(20232026)

727 family — FAA registry deregistrations

Left the US registry
9aircraft
Stayed domestic
6vs 3 exported
Avg age at retirement
49.5years
Still US-registered
35aircraft
Where this family's parts catalog concentrates — the systems most exposed to incoming teardown supply

FAA registry data. Domestic deregistration is a teardown proxy — it also captures re-registrations and some unflagged exports, so it is not a confirmed part-out count; exported aircraft left the US fleet intact and are not USM supply. ATA shares reflect where this directory's parts for the family concentrate (parts in parentheses) — a coverage signal, not the aircraft's bill of materials or a teardown-yield forecast.

Engine-program supply pressure(since 2023)

FAA registry — US-registered fleet

Engines account for roughly half of all MRO spend, so engine programs shedding aircraft are where retirement supply carries the most value.

Engine modelActive tailsEngine unitsRetired since ’23ExportedAvg age at dereg
P & W JT8D series8417229834.4 yr
P & W JT8D-9 series9244253.8 yr
P & W JT8D-18213033 yr
P & W JT8D-17 series7161144 yr
P & W JT8D-156131151 yr
P & W JT8D-1761500
P & W JT8D-9A51100
P & W JT8D-15A1300

FAA registry data, US-registered aircraft only. Counts reflect the engine model as registered — generic “series” rows coexist with thrust-variant rows, so per-variant figures are partial. Retired = domestic deregistrations (a teardown proxy, not a confirmed part-out); exported aircraft left the US fleet intact. Active tails span every family the engine flies on, not just this one.

Maintenance economics(US carriers, through 2024)

727 family — BTS Form 41 filings

Direct maintenance per block hour
$680fleet avg
Airframe / engine split
$670/$10
Reporting carriers
1

BTS Form 41 data (Schedule P-5.2 maintenance expense over T-2 block hours), Group III US carriers only — filers above $1B annual revenue; smaller US operators, Part 135, and all non-US carriers are not in this data. Dollars are accrual-basis from regulatory filings (reserves and depreciation included), so they benchmark fleet economics and do not track to individual repair events. Averages are block-hour- weighted across every reporting carrier; the range spans per-carrier rates after excluding marginal reporting slices, and small carrier counts are noisy.

Airworthiness Directive activity

FAA / EASA public regulatory data

4airworthiness directives affecting this fleet — recurring compliance demand for the parts and shops that serve it
Most recent
  • FAA AD 2026-13-15effective Jul 1, 2026Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 707, 717, and 727 airplanes; Model DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 airplanes; Model MD-10 and MD-11 airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes; and Model MD 90-30 airplanes. This AD was prompted by the determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied upon to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G Lower C- Band) while operating in Canadian airspace, and the determination that during approach, landings, and go-arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged, which could result in reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain safe flight and landing of the airplane. This AD requires revising the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate limitations prohibiting certain operations requiring radio altimeter data when operating in Canadian airspace. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2023-12-15effective Jun 21, 2023Mixed actions

    The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2022-09- 18, which applied to all The Boeing Company Model 707, 717, and 727 airplanes; Model DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 airplanes; Model MD-10 and MD-11 airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC- 9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 airplanes; and Model MD 90-30 airplanes. AD 2022-09-18 required revising the limitations and operating procedures sections of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, instrument landing system (ILS) approaches, non-precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, when in the presence of interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G C-Band) as identified by Notices to Air Missions (NOTAMs). Since the FAA issued AD 2022-09-18, the FAA determined that additional limitations are needed due to the continued deployment of new 5G C-Band stations whose signals are expected to cover most of the contiguous United States at transmission frequencies between 3.7-3.98 GHz. This AD requires revising the limitations and operating procedures sections of the AFM to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, ILS approaches, non-precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, due to the presence of 5G C-Band interference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2022-25-01effective Feb 16, 2023Mixed actions

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 707 and Model 727 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report indicating cracking in fastener holes at the center wing box and at certain positions of the rear spar and lower skin on a Model 737-300 airplane. A cross model review determined that similar cracking of the fastener holes in the center wing box lower skin could occur on Model 707 and Model 727 airplanes. For Model 707 airplanes this AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the center wing box lower skin for cracking and repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and ultrasonic (UT) inspections of the rear spar lower chord at a certain position for cracking, repetitive sealant application, and repair if necessary. For Model 727 airplanes this AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the center wing box, lower skin, and rear spar lower chord at a certain location for cracking, repetitive sealant application, and repair if necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

  • FAA AD 2022-09-18effective May 23, 2022Prohibition

    The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 707, 717, and 727 airplanes; Model DC-8, DC-9, and DC-10 airplanes; Model MD-10 and MD-11 airplanes; Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), DC-9-87 (MD-87), and MD-88 (collectively described, in the preamble of this AD, as MD-80) airplanes; and Model MD-90-30 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a determination that radio altimeters cannot be relied on to perform their intended function if they experience interference from wireless broadband operations in the 3.7-3.98 GHz frequency band (5G C-Band), and a recent determination that during approach, landings, and go- arounds, as a result of this interference, certain airplane systems may not properly function, resulting in increased flightcrew workload while on approach with the flight director, autothrottle, or autopilot engaged. This AD requires revising the limitations and operating procedures sections of the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate specific operating procedures for, depending on the airplane model, instrument landing system (ILS) approaches, non- precision approaches, ground spoiler deployment, and go-around and missed approaches, when in the presence of 5G C-Band interference as identified by Notices to Air Missions (NOTAMs). The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Directives linked to this airframe family in the FAA / EASA regulatory corpus we have processed — not a complete historical AD list. An AD is a compliance requirement that drives scheduled work (inspections, replacements, modifications) across the fleet; inspection directives are not replacement directives, and none of this is a prediction that any part will fail.